Drug-safety coverage on Peptide News Digest is the FAERS-side cross-section: post-market AE reports, label updates, MDL litigation, and comparative safety analyses across approved drugs.
Key threads in 2025 and 2026: the Ozempic MDL (3,363 cases over alleged gastroparesis and other injuries before Judge Karen Marston in EDPA, with critical Daubert and summary judgment deadlines in late April 2026), Medscape FAERS analyses showing different AE profiles across GLP-1 drugs, NAION optic-neuropathy signals, and the qualitative literature on emotional side effects of weight loss.
Stories here cover FAERS signals, label updates, and litigation. See #safety, #peptide-safety, and #litigation.
Public Citizen, the consumer advocacy organization founded by Ralph Nader in 1971, published its July 2026 'Outrage of the Month' column titled 'The FDA, Peptides and RFK Jr.' The piece argues that when the FDA banned compounding of nineteen peptides in 2023, it cited immunogenicity risks for certain routes of administration, impurity concerns, and lack of sufficient information to know whether the drugs would cause harm when administered to humans. The advocacy position: 'There is no credible reason to believe that peptides deemed unproven or unsafe in 2023 are now miraculously safe and effective.' Public Citizen also raised concerns about the eight new PCAC panelists named Monday June 29, warning that the committee could be filled with members who would 'rubber stamp Kennedy's wishes' rather than substantively review the FDA staff briefing documents concluding the seven peptides have insufficient evidence for 503A bulks list eligibility. The piece adds to a June-July critic chorus that includes STAT News (panelist conflicts), NBC News + NPR + Washington Post (FDA scientists disagree with RFK Jr.), and BioCentury (peptide deregulation threatens drug-safety foundations).
BioCentury, the pharma-industry analyst publication, published a piece late in the week of June 29 arguing that HHS Secretary RFK Jr.'s peptide deregulation push threatens the foundations of drug safety. The industry-analyst framing adds to the growing critic chorus documenting concerns about the July 23-24 PCAC vote: FDA career-staff briefing documents concluding all seven peptides have insufficient evidence; STAT News' scoop on the panel-composition changes and conflicts of interest; NBC News, NPR, and Washington Post coverage of the FDA-staff-versus-RFK-Jr. tension; and Public Citizen's July 'Outrage of the Month' advocacy position. The specific BioCentury argument is that the drug-safety framework depends on FDA's ability to defer to career scientific staff on safety and evidence questions; a political override of the staff position (via new panelist composition or via FDA acceptance of a panel vote against staff) would establish a precedent applicable well beyond the seven peptides under immediate review. Additional voices: Personal Care Insights framed the deregulation as 'amid safety concern backlash'; the AP characterized the panel composition as a shift from 'academics and researchers' to 'health professionals who prescribe, produce or promote peptides.'
BioSpace analysis frames the ACHIEVE-4 results as a direct answer to the FDA's April 1 letter requesting post-market liver injury and cardiovascular data. The 'outstanding' type 2 diabetes data, combined with cardiovascular safety and all-cause death reductions, strengthens Lilly's position ahead of its Q2 FDA submission and could reduce regulatory friction for the oral GLP-1 franchise.
The FDA asked Eli Lilly for additional safety data on liver injury linked to Foundayo (orforglipron), plus post-marketing trials to assess cardiovascular event risk and delayed gastric emptying. A lactation study was also required. The letter, signed April 1, was published April 14 — just two weeks after the drug's fast-track approval under the National Priority Voucher program.
Analysis of the FAERS database (2012–2025) examining exenatide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide reveals distinct risk profiles, suggesting not all GLP-1 agents carry the same safety concerns.