The House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (chaired by Rep. John Moolenaar, R-Michigan) received responses from five drugmakers by the 5:00 PM ET Friday July 17, 2026 deadline: Merck, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. The June 29 letters had requested records on due diligence processes, data protection standards, informed consent procedures, and oversight practices at Chinese clinical-trial and manufacturing sites, particularly at Xinjiang-region hospitals and hospitals affiliated with the People's Liberation Army. Documented trial counts: Merck 224 China studies since 2005 (31 Xinjiang + 40 military); Eli Lilly 220-plus studies since 2003 (11 Xinjiang + 16 military 2016-2024); Pfizer 6 Xinjiang + 43 military; AbbVie 100-plus studies since 2007 (17 Xinjiang + 16 military); Bristol-Myers Squibb 180 studies since 2004 (8 Xinjiang + 17 military 2015-2024). The Committee letters explicitly state there is no evidence any of the five drugmakers has engaged in illegal activity or wrongdoing. The next phase is Committee review of the submitted records and potential public hearings if oversight questions remain unresolved.
The House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (chaired by Rep. John Moolenaar, R-Michigan) reaches its 5:00 PM ET response deadline today Friday July 17, 2026 for five US drugmakers: Merck, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, AbbVie, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. The June 29 letters requested records on due diligence processes, data protection standards, and oversight procedures at Chinese trial sites, particularly Xinjiang-region hospitals and hospitals affiliated with China's military. Documented trial counts: Merck sponsored or collaborated on 224 clinical studies in China since 2005, including at least 31 trials involving Xinjiang-region hospitals and at least 40 trials at Chinese military medical centers. Eli Lilly sponsored or collaborated on more than 220 clinical studies in China since 2003, including at least 11 Xinjiang-region trials and at least 16 military-medical-center trials between 2016 and 2024. Pfizer had at least 6 Xinjiang-region trials and 43 military-hospital trials. AbbVie had 100-plus clinical studies in China since 2007, including at least 17 Xinjiang-region and 16 military. Bristol-Myers Squibb had approximately 180 China studies since 2004, including at least 8 Xinjiang and 17 military between 2015 and 2024. The Committee letters state there is no evidence any of the five drugmakers engaged in illegal activity or wrongdoing. Merck said patient safety and ethical integrity are foundational; Eli Lilly said it is reviewing the letter closely; AbbVie declined to comment.
The House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party's July 17, 2026 response deadline arrives tomorrow for five drugmakers on records of clinical trials conducted at Xinjiang-region hospitals and Chinese military medical centers: Merck, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Chair Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Michigan) sent letters on June 29 requesting due diligence, data protection processes, and standards at Chinese trial sites. Updated trial counts documented in the letters: Merck sponsored or collaborated on 224 clinical studies in China since 2005, including at least 31 trials involving Xinjiang-region hospitals and at least 40 trials involving Chinese military medical centers. Eli Lilly appears to have sponsored or collaborated on more than 220 clinical studies in China since 2003, with at least 11 Xinjiang-region trials and at least 16 military-medical-center trials between 2016 and 2024. Pfizer had at least 6 Xinjiang-region trials and 43 military-hospital trials. AbbVie had 17 Xinjiang and 16 military. Bristol-Myers Squibb's specific counts were not detailed in the summary but the company received the same request. Merck stated that patient safety and ethical integrity are foundational to its clinical research; Eli Lilly said it is reviewing the letter closely.
The House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (chaired by Rep. John Moolenaar, R-Michigan) faces its July 17 response deadline one week from tomorrow for five drugmakers under national-security investigation over clinical trials conducted at Chinese sites: Eli Lilly, Merck, AbbVie, Pfizer, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. The letters, first reported by Reuters, were dated June 29 and asked companies to provide details of due diligence, data protection processes, and other standards at their trial sites in China, with particular attention to the Xinjiang region and military hospitals. Eli Lilly disclosed sponsoring at least 11 trials at Xinjiang-region hospitals plus at least 16 trials at Chinese military medical centers and hospitals, across type 2 diabetes, heart disease, obesity, Alzheimer's disease, axial spondyloarthritis, breast cancer, lupus, alopecia, Crohn's disease, and additional indications. The committee said it has no evidence of company wrongdoing but cites potential ethical and national-security risks. The letters run parallel to the BIOSECURE Act framework, the June 30 STAT Pharmalittle preview of the probe, and industry warnings from Fierce Biotech that the scrutiny risks 'huge distraction and expense' for US biopharma.
A Chemical & Engineering News feature published in June 2026, drawing on data from the CAS Content Collection, documented the cyclic-peptide patenting surge over 2020 to April 2026. Chinese universities are the top filers globally on cyclic peptides. Outside China, US universities lead. Among corporates, Bicycle Therapeutics and Bristol Myers Squibb were called out for sustained patent activity covering cancer, infectious, inflammatory, and autoimmune disease indications. The article frames cyclic peptides as bridging the small-molecule and biologic divide: enhanced conformational rigidity, elimination of unstable terminal residues, and improved metabolic stability are the structural advantages that allow some cyclic peptides to be dosed orally. Merck's enlicitide decanoate (MK-0616, oral PCSK9 macrocyclic peptide for hyperlipidemia) was cited as the proof point for oral-pill cyclic-peptide drug development; an enlicitide NDA submission was underway as of mid-2026. The broader market backdrop: macrocyclic and stapled peptides are projected to grow from $1.22 billion in 2024 to $4.76 billion by 2030 at a 21.44% CAGR, driven mostly by oncology pipelines and the macrocyclic deal flow that includes the Unnatural Products-Novartis $1.7-1.8B cardiovascular pact (February 2026), Biogen-Dayra $50M+ immunology pact (November 2025), and the Parabilis Helicon platform (Regeneron $2.3B collaboration, June 10 $670M record IPO).